Triple Triple
New member
Hey guys, I have a quick question. My cousin just picked up a 97 mach Z 800 and thinks he will smoke my 01 srx 700. What do you guys think, I picked up the front of the sled and it seemed pretty heavy. What do these dyno at? I asked around and nobody knew. There best guess was 130-140. I personally think I will get him. Both sleds are stock except studding.
blueflash
New member
I saw a 2004 polaris xc sp 500 beat a 1999 mach z in about 1000 feet on the ice. The xc was clutched and the mach z was stock.
tomseal6
VIP Member
i heard they are 140HP in general, i think it takes an 800 from polaris or acrtic cat to equal the HP of an srx. the mach-z is a heavy pig. much mure noticeable than a srx. i dont have the weights but the srx is like 533 and i think the z is like 565 something or more.
If that Z is in good condition and setup well, you have your hands full with it. Those sleds were 150 hp and fast in the long run. But the SRX is no slough either.
My guess is that it´s close between you two. With minor mods you can get a 170 hp out of that triple Z. Well setup 800 Z´s still kick the new Z´s butt...
IKe
My guess is that it´s close between you two. With minor mods you can get a 170 hp out of that triple Z. Well setup 800 Z´s still kick the new Z´s butt...
IKe
sxrsist
VIP Member
i agree, they are a strong 150 hp. like comparing the old max 4 800, they made hp but needed to be in the right hands to fly
tomseal6
VIP Member
i wonder why doo went back to twins if the tripples ran so good? i remember when the formula 3 tripple 600 was a hot sled on the trail about 10 years ago
tomseal6
VIP Member
sxrsist
VIP Member
they were strong, but not the best lasting motor, like current doos, crank proplems and such
Junior
New member
tomseal6 said:i wonder why doo went back to twins if the tripples ran so good?
only costs 2/3 as much to build
sxrsist said:they were strong, but not the best lasting motor, like current doos, crank proplems and such
different problems I think, the bottom ends on the new ones seem to be sturdier now that they have the bearing cages sorted, but the pistons/rings seem to be flakier than ever.
allwell, what can you doo?
YAMMIEGOD3:16
Active member
MACH Z FLY. AND JUST YOUR LUCK ITS A 97 WHICH WAS FASTEST YEAR and first 800 CC. THEY ARE 150 H.P. ALL DAY LONG AND THE 97 HAD THE OLDER CHASSIS WHICH WERE WAY BETTER FOR DRAG RACING. BETTER HAVE YOUR SRX SHARP !! 3:16 (tony)
YAMMIEGOD3:16
Active member
AND I,LL TELL YA HOW MUCH I RESPECT THE MACH Z, IT WILL BEAT THE NEW ONES. HANDS DOWN. !! 3:16 (tony)
tomseal6
VIP Member
so a well tuned srx will take it you are hinting at?
Triple Triple
New member
Damn...should be a good one. I'll let you guys know. Hope fully it will be MACH Z.......so I can shut him up.
tomseal6
VIP Member
i wonder if a set of 97 mach z pipes will fit on a srx lol they look a litttle bigger.
YAMMIEGOD3:16
Active member
RACING A MACH Z FROM 96-01 IS NO WALK IN THE PARK. YOU COULD SAY THAT 01 SRX BETTER HAVE A GOOD SET-UP. !! 3:16 (tony)
SLEDSTART
New member
I had a 96 for a few seasons. Took it on the trails once and was sore as hell the next day. It was a pig. A very fast but heavy pig. I ice raced it in local radar runs for a season or two and then sold it. It was a very strong running sled and was fun to rip around on a lake with it. I always thought it looked like a big *** shoe though. Bone stock on a hard pack road wide open I saw 110 on it.
If you have yor SRX dialed you should be good to go. I have a 2000 SRX and with just some clutching I know this sled is faster than the Mach was. I have seen 113 on the SRX and I think I had a bad powervalve at the time. Just replaced them so I will see what it does now...
Let us know who wins...
If you have yor SRX dialed you should be good to go. I have a 2000 SRX and with just some clutching I know this sled is faster than the Mach was. I have seen 113 on the SRX and I think I had a bad powervalve at the time. Just replaced them so I will see what it does now...
Let us know who wins...
vipertripplexxx
New member
If it was 45 degrees out and the jetting was pig rich, otherwise something was wrong. Z's will run alot more than that on flat stuff!Bone stock on a hard pack road wide open I saw 110 on it.
vipertripplexxx
New member
yamigod is right!
Yea I'm rolli'n when they say 165 HP mach 1000?? The old mach's are just as fast, if not faster, and they are 150? and heavy ta boot!! Those old mach's run some good numbers. Bottom line is clutching and jetting, if he's got his set right your probably gonna have a little trouble.
Yea I'm rolli'n when they say 165 HP mach 1000?? The old mach's are just as fast, if not faster, and they are 150? and heavy ta boot!! Those old mach's run some good numbers. Bottom line is clutching and jetting, if he's got his set right your probably gonna have a little trouble.
SLEDSTART
New member
yeah for some reason that day when I would rip it down that road it seemed like it was juming cogs at top end. I tightened the track 3 times until it seemed to tight and it was still doing it. Brought it home...put it in the paper and sold it. Did not look into what it was. I was done with it...
SRX M10
New member
I am on my second srx and only buy yamaha, but anyone who says that an srx can take the mach if it has a little clutching has never driven a mach. They are a big pig that goes like hell in a straight line. Stock for stock my money is on the mach. Look at the bright side though, your srx beats it in every other way and you don't have to wrestle that pig all day long!