wls
Member
The belt for a 78 ex440, is listed as 8F2-17641-01-00
Belt for a 78 ET 340 listed as 820-17641-00-00
Whats the diff between these belts? thanks
Belt for a 78 ET 340 listed as 820-17641-00-00
Whats the diff between these belts? thanks
might just be the hardness of the rubber. the et one would be softer. i know my et belt will work on my war to get me home as long as no wot hard running.l
wls
Member
Maim said:
Maybe if the ET one is softer, it would work better in my situation, for a oval racer. But if its not as strong belt that would'nt be good.
89X-17641-01-00 (replaces 8F2-17641-01-00) Not too sure of the original spec on the 8F2, but the 89X thickness is .5mm shorter and the angle of the belt is 4* smaller.
This is compared to the 820.
This is compared to the 820.
Last edited: