SrXxTrEeM
New member
Supercharge vs Turbocharge
I am interested in hearing pros & cons on whether to Supercharge or Turbocharge my RX-1.
Gas mileage, durability,ease of installation, noise-sound,extras which are needed to run either, etc. etc.
Do you have one, please give me some friendly chatter concerning or voice your concerns, it will help me make up my mind.
I am interested in hearing pros & cons on whether to Supercharge or Turbocharge my RX-1.
Gas mileage, durability,ease of installation, noise-sound,extras which are needed to run either, etc. etc.
Do you have one, please give me some friendly chatter concerning or voice your concerns, it will help me make up my mind.
Motorhead
Member
Where did my old post come from ?
I am not sure how my old post made this forum under another person's username BUT, we've learned that as of right now the only choice is to turbo charge.
I am not sure how my old post made this forum under another person's username BUT, we've learned that as of right now the only choice is to turbo charge.
SrXxTrEeM
New member
i copy and past from rx1 we needed ? here for the new forums to get them going we copy and past lots on friday
so you guys had some stuff to read
the more the better
so if there is good ? out there you see
post them you never know
there is no dumb ? only dumb answers
so you guys had some stuff to read
the more the better
so if there is good ? out there you see
post them you never know
there is no dumb ? only dumb answers
utah340six
New member
look at it this way ith a supper charger under the hood if one blows chunks you can still have kids
Hebi
New member
I say go with a turbo. They are more efficient. This is because with a blower you use some of the engine's power to drive a belt that drives the blower.
Also, with a turbo you can cool the air coming in the engine which will help you make more power.
Ive heard that turbo lag is all but non-existent on turbocharged RX-1s, so that really does away with the only downside to a turbo.
Hebi
Also, with a turbo you can cool the air coming in the engine which will help you make more power.
Ive heard that turbo lag is all but non-existent on turbocharged RX-1s, so that really does away with the only downside to a turbo.
Hebi
jwiedmayer
New member
I'm not sure if this applies but I think it does. On cars with low torque engines the turbo works better than the supercharger. Too much of the engines torque is used to drive the supercharger vs. the turbo.
WrdAl
New member
Look at the FAQs on Mountain Performance, interesting points about Supercharging (SC) versus Turbocharging (TC). If I was inclined to spend over $4500 for boosted HP, I'd do the Supercharger, should be better for the type of riding I like. Plus I like the idea of 4-6 hour install time and use of stock exhaust. If I wanted all out top speed then I might go the turbo, but I think SC will be more "trail-able" power. Having driven cars with both, I prefer the surge of power from SC over the burst of power from TC, easier to control and use. Plus from the pictures on MPIs site, the install is a lot cleaner and the stealth factor is greater
Last edited:
BETHEVIPER
Life Member
what sounds better, I got turboed or I got blown? preaty easy choice.