Late 70's Exciter 340 or 440 Noobie

doogymon

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
12
Age
61
Location
North Bay
Exciter 340 or 440

Which one for weekend trail riding(76,77,78 )? Fuel mileage is a bonus.

Cheers
 
Last edited:

doogymon said:
Which one for weekend trail riding(76,77,78 )? Fuel mileage is a bonus.

Cheers
78 has the tapered tunnel,little more clearance for field riding etc
 
Thanks Thunderjet440. Trying to find differences in the engines. Not really caring about top-end speed. Wondering about parts, reliability and how much fuel the 440 drinks compared to the 340. etc. I only ride for about 4 hours at a time.

Doog.
 
not sure about the mpg,but the yammie exciter was one of the most reliable sleds ever made.
 
I cannot say about the fuel mileage on a 340 Exciter, but I have had many 338 YAMAHA'S and they have all been very good on fuel.

Though the 340 Exciter engine is a wee bit different in that it is rated at 38 hp (That is what I was told though and have no first hand knowledge, yet.) with a single carb and pipe which is more than any of the others and may affect mileage a little.

That said, I think the difference would be negligible, probably a wee better than a 433, which isn't bad, and nothing I would worry about cuz your biggest enemy there, provided correct-carb-tuning, the rest of the drive-train correct and set-up, will be your right thumb.

Very reliable sled. Have fun.
 
get one post '78 for fuel mileage. This was the year that they changed from a round slide carb to a butterfly, and it improved fuel consumption. I get around 10 mpg on my '79 440.

Overall the 440 is a pretty zippy sled, it will take my father's pro-action venture 600 in a quarter mile at 65-70 mph.
 


Back
Top