Ripsaw/sixpitch durability?

wanasrx

wanasrx

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
410
Age
61
Location
Ghent, NY
Which one is more durable?
It's for the srx. Thinking 1.25". I know the six is suppose to be better in powder and the rip better on trail. Is there really a noticable difference between the two on the trail.? I was leaning toward the six because the srx could use the help in the deep stuff. I run probably 50/50 on and off trail.
Thanks for any help.
 
I have the 9818 six-pitch on my srx and it has held up very good for me with no noticable top end loss and it is does good in the powder. Everybody seems to be happy with the ripsaw as well. I would say go with whichever one you can get a better deal on.

Better skis will help you alot in powder as well as on the trail.
 
six pitch is a little more durable, some guys have a lot of porblems with the ripsaws coming apart, moreso on the oem ripsaw than if you would buy one from camoplast. Both are great tracks, i would go with the six pitch myself, the ripsaw sucks off trail.
 
My ripsaw got wasted in one season.I was unable to stud my 04 viper s and the track spin just killed that track.I have run the 9830 on my 01 srx with great results.I will be buying a 1" 9830 for my viper this year.I paid $280.00 no tax for the 1" 9830 for my srx,can anyone beat that?
 
Yea,i ran 144 extreme max studs.I plan on running 144 in my viper also,the studs were cheap and held up great.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Back
Top