Venom
Member
Hi all,
I'd like to replace my 121 x 15 x 1 inch Camoplast cone design track with a 121 x 15 x ? Ripsaw track. What lug height can fit without hitting the heat exchangers? I want 1.5 inch, but is that too much? If so, I don't want to spend all my money going from a 1 inch lug to a 1.25 lug, I don't think .25 inch will make that much of a difference.
Thanks...
Roger.
I'd like to replace my 121 x 15 x 1 inch Camoplast cone design track with a 121 x 15 x ? Ripsaw track. What lug height can fit without hitting the heat exchangers? I want 1.5 inch, but is that too much? If so, I don't want to spend all my money going from a 1 inch lug to a 1.25 lug, I don't think .25 inch will make that much of a difference.
Thanks...
Roger.
n2oiroc
New member
the 1.25" is a huge difference over a 1". a 1.5" will fit if you dont have any heat exchanger of tunnel protectors. if your trail riding, a 1.25" ripsaw will really wake it up!
even if u can only get 1.25" ripsaw to fit still go for it
it is WAY better then that 1" cone
but i say u could get a 1.5" to fit no problem
it is WAY better then that 1" cone
but i say u could get a 1.5" to fit no problem
1.25 ripsaw would be ideal..... once you run an 1.25 track you will never run a shorty again....
yamaholic22
Active member
1.25 with protectors in will fit, 1.5 without protectors, both work with 9 tooth drivers if you aren't studding.
Venom
Member
Thanks everyone, ...seems that a 1.25 inch ripsaw is the best track for combination riding (deep snow and trail riding). I'll hopefully pick one up within the next year.
Last edited:
sledlife
New member
I just installed a 1.5 Ripsaw on my 97 VMAX 600 with the 9 tooth drivers. It does fit but it is tight. If I were to do it again I would probably drop a tooth to get a little more clearence. I have about 1/4 - 3/8" clearence right now.
It is definetly worth it though, and if you are going to do it go with the 1.5 instead of the 1.25.
It is definetly worth it though, and if you are going to do it go with the 1.5 instead of the 1.25.