07 Doo's

There's nothing new about it. I just commented that they brought back an old model name (i.e. Phazer).
 
That MXZ XRS sled looks pretty interesting, looks like the race chassis with trail motors? Bet that would be incredible in the rough stuff, I'm really liking that sled.
 
def. some nice lookin graphics, good for 23 hp dont ya think? i dunno, rev platform a little over done in my book. i mean, if you don't like it, whats your choices? yamaha has apex, phazer, vector/nytro/rage and subtle variations in between. but hey, the rev platform is working good for em so props to them, just that they may lose out on sales if potential consumers don't like it.
 
Sheomet said:
That MXZ XRS sled looks pretty interesting, looks like the race chassis with trail motors? Bet that would be incredible in the rough stuff, I'm really liking that sled.

those definately aren't going to be race track chassis on the trails. More like trail chassis and engines with race graphics and a couple suspension upgrades.
 
I have to admit I think Ski-Doo is on the right track with their sleds. I'm liking the REV's more and more every day.....and I don't think anyone can deny that Ski-Doo hit the nail on the head with the REV chassis. Maybe too cramped for some though. I am going to seriously consider a REV 800 Summit 144" as my next sled. That won't be for another 3 years though.
 
Last edited:
v-twin 800 fourstroke...interesting the freestyle chasis is the uglyest thing on the face of the earth.
 
and just what is up with the BEE?
Yea, I think i'm gonna get a sticker of a "can a wasp killer" on my sled!!!!!!!
and I don't think anyone can deny that Ski-Doo hit the nail on the head with the REV chassis.
you can have that rider forward crap in my opinion!!! I hate riding my pal's rev, and I can't seem to get him off my sled!!!!!!! Only thing they are good for is snowcross! I will guarantee ya, unless the trail is totally pounded to $hit, you won't have a chance in the twistys!!!!!! Your center of gravity is way to high!
M2C.
 
It seems like people buy things, and have a problem admitting to themselves that it was a mistake. So they make excusses until they have convinced themselves they did the right thing. Then they convince others to do the same. I purchased a 98 xc700, and have no problem admitting it was a bad choice.
My friend bought that ski-doo, and said yep you should get one, best thing since sliced bread!! Then after numerous trips, and riding my sled, he kept saying "wow you sled is so predictable, and corners on a dime". Now he actually admits that he only uses half of his suspension most of the time, and he wants to stop making excusess, for laging behind, and get something that handles better in the tight stuff! I have let a couple people who are rev riders ride my sled, and everyone of them gets off the sled and says "YEA, BUT IF IT GETS BUMPY, THEN YOU WILL WISH YOU HAD MINE"

PROBABLY NOT! IV'E GOT AN M-10, so It would have to be REALLY, REALLY BIG STUFF!!!!
 
the Rev is a GREAT chassis for a very specific application (slowcross). for the ditchbanger segment I think it's pretty much the undisputed champion, but it's NOT a good corner carver chassis. That said none of the manufacturers seem to care much about that segment anymore (guess groomed trails aren't that common anymore or something?)
 
Here's my take on thing's. The Rev chassis by skidoo was the biggest chassis design to hit the snowmobile world. It hit many areas of riding that have always been ignored. It is a very good chassis..BUT.. I definitely agree with what others say. Ski doo made, and is still making a very bad choice by not offering newer versions of older style chassis. There are many people on the market, especially older people, that liked older chassis design's and were very used to riding them in all types of conditions. The chassis can always be improved without being completely forgotten. I think ski doo is losing many people to other brands or to older, used sleds instead of new ones,because it completely deleted what a snowmobile used to be. The part that is scaring me now is all the other manufacturers including yamaha are seeming to do the same. (ie. no more viper chassis). Before I became addicted to Yamaha I was going to buy a new ski doo. I was all set, money in hand. I had to wait two days for the sled to come in. In that two days I had a chance to ride my buddies 2004 mxz600ho rev. It was pretty damn fast. Everything else sucked about my test ride. It's hard to handle, hard to get comfortable. I couldn't turn the thing at all and I was actually scared while riding it at one point. I hit 95mph in a field and the sled would not move from it's straight path. What good is having a sled that goes fast and lands bumps well when you can't control it?? Basically for me it's was a fun new design but wasn't at all my style of riding. To me it's not a long trip cruiser, or comfortable trail sled which is what I was looking for. The story ended with me buying my vmax off a guy at the skidoo dealer who was a yamaha mechanic for 20 years. He had just started working with skidoo. By the way he only left yamaha because he did'nt want to work on fourstrokes. I think my overall point here is that the rev is a good chassis, but it's not for every rider. If other manufacturers follow ski doo's lead with deleting the past like it never happened I think alot of the younger generations will be happy but what about all the others?? :yam:
 
BNG, expect something completly new from BRP next year, if nothing new next year then they are really dropping the ball
 
Well im really diggin the MXZ XRS800. They didnt release any weights though?

Don't think i will be on blue when i buy another sled. Looks like doo will be getting my business from now on!
 
Recently I picked up an 06 GTX (touring sled) 500ss for my wife. Those of you who say that the Doo's cannot carve like the Viper must not have driven a 06 Doo. If it was an 06 it was not set up properly.
In 06 Doo lowered the ride height 1.5" and changed their rear suspension to the SC4 to eliminate the ski lift in corners.
We now have just over 325 miles on it in the Hurley and Antigo areas.
I was able to ride the GTX faster and more comfortably through the trails. When getting up towards the tank you can get through turns even faster. With NO ski lift. When large mogals were in the trail the GTX was in much better control over my old Viper.
A buddy of mine has an 03 800 Rev that did scare me in the corners...the straights were great, especially if it was a trashed trail. The 06 Rev is a different sled. This same buddy bought his wife an 06 GSX 600 SDI and he preferred riding the 06 for the same reason.
I loved my Viper, but after riding the Doo I am now a believer in the rider forward design. I did not have any problems on big mile trips. I think because my GTX is layed back about 5.5" compared to the standard Rev.
The ski stance also really helps. 47" compared to my 42 on the Viper.
The Attack was going to be my next sled. but after the blast I had on the Doo I think I might get another GTX.
I compared the two to help me decide:
47" stance vs 42
both 136" tracks
496 lbs (with rear seat/backrest removed) vs 575
much more storage on the GTX
same or better mpg than the Attack
New 06 GTX 6,000 otd vs Attack 8900 otd.
The only neg for me is the slower top end (Gtx 109hp, Attack 150) and the use of some injection oil.
I am still a Yammi fan. I'll just be wearin' my Yamaha undies while riding my Doo ;)!
 


Back
Top