are you even kidding on this one??sxr_700 said:Who will win on the lake?
Well, an XLT really isnt that fast to begin with. I had a '95 600 XCR and it was only good for about 80 mph. It was the same as an XLT but had high-compression heads and was good for about 95 hp. Mine didnt have triple-pipes but you could have gotten a XCR 600 SP that year that was a totally different sled than what I had.yamaholic22 said:Yea i had a Polaris XLT a couple years ago with PSI triple pipes and some good ass clutching, along with 144 studs, and i had a buddy with a F3, and i would always beat him in the first 800 feet or so, and then he would just slowly but steadily start walking by, everytime. Those things sure are tanks though![]()
Hebi said:Well, an XLT really isnt that fast to begin with. I had a '95 600 XCR and it was only good for about 80 mph. It was the same as an XLT but had high-compression heads and was good for about 95 hp. Mine didnt have triple-pipes but you could have gotten a XCR 600 SP that year that was a totally different sled than what I had.
Even if you had an XLT that was tweaked to the limit you are only looking at 110 hp.
F3s werent that fast either. I used to smoke MXz 583s all day long with my 600 XCR. Mine was almost totally bone stock too. I tweaked the clutch a bit and I dropped one tooth top chaincase gear. My XCR was set up to absolutely haul from 0-80 mph. I ride mostly twisty trails, and for that my XCR kicked butt. I rode with a lot of people who had bigger, newer and more powerfull sleds that could not keep up with me in the woods.
I say that the SXr pulls away off the line and never looks back.
Hebi