um, sorry madmatt, but it wasn't just last year that i had some clutching questions. for the last 3 yrs, i've been doing nothing but testing different clutch setups on multiple sleds. everyone @ work gives me shit, cause i always have my clutches apart to try something different. i've even tried up to 15 different combos on 1 sled alone. you know how many different weights i have and tried? you know how many different springs i have and tried? you know how many different helixs i have and tried? you know how many different roller secondaries i own and have tried? no you don't. i've learned alot since i started this clutching thing. i've been doing just as much of this clutching gig as you have. also, after a while of gathering notes and seeing what affect takes places after "this" or "that" change, one can start to predict outcomes pretty good. hence the reason some guys can shoot out a setup/ballpark setup, and it be within 100 rpm or so, from what's needed. i never ever said that i had any kind of "authority" here. not sure why you feel this way and why i seem to not be able to get any kind of respect on here. this is a public forum, where we are all able to share our thoughts and such. you post what you feel is going to help this guy out and i will do the same. this guy was just looking for some help, and i stated what i feel is the correction to the problem. don't know why you are knocking on me for helping a fellow TY member out?? yes, aaen's clutching book says to tune rpms w/primary, but i'm sure that is w/the correct helix in clutch. also, if one has too steep of a helix, it will lug the engine and overshift. if one has that problem, taking 1 gram or so out of primary isn't the answer. a helix change is in order....sometimes the secondary needs work to keep rpms where they need to be. if he can pull near the correct rpm needed (he's pulling 8500 when he should be pulling 8800), for up to 65mph, and then rpms start to fall off, in my testing/tuning experience, it has shown me that the finish was too steep, and the secondary is opening up too fast. madmatt, if you always have to tune the primary for the correct rpm's, then why is there more than 1 helix angle available? if your suppose to be able to just change rivets to correct the rpm problem, w/whatever weights are in the primary, then there wouldn't be all these different angles available aftermarket and from OEM. there has to be a balance between the secondary and primary. also, that's great that you want to maybe save the guy some $, if the helix don't work, but sometimes a person may need to buy multiple parts to try/test out, like tony said. hence the reason i have tons of dollars in clutching stuff. not saying this guy has to spend thousands or even hundreds. i think its a great jesture on your part, to offer to mail your helix to him, for trial. lets have him try that helix out and have him report back??
my guess is if he just takes a little weight out of the primary, it will run 100-200 rpm higher up to 65mph or so, and then start to drop down near 8000 or so again.