norwegian said:
Is it just me or doesn't it look like the belt sits on kind of an angle with the hauck sheave installed?
absolutely correct , belt tolerence is reduced by ading this thicker sheave,
Tony; i suggest you break specific belts to this sheave , im quite certain that the sheave angle is not the same as oem , i have tested alot with this , the wear tapper on the chasis side of the belt will be different then the outer side .
learned a leson when i wwent to an event with only one belt broke in to the sheave , ya you guessed it i blew it first run , spent the rest of the day wondering why the sled ran like s,,,,t , dreamed up all kind of excuses crank out of phase etc......
always wondered if the secondary inner sheave had the same angle if it would work more efficiently, as it is, under very little resistance it does work on ice , but due to the fact that there is less belt surface on the secondary inner sheave , expect under load like deeeper snow , to pull cor.ds and blow more belts . also may apply to you if your set up requires a stiff secondary spring and or a wrap greater then 70
vince