bluebullet
New member
Here is my cut:
Yamaha: Fastest: 1995 V-max-4 800 Quickest: 2001 SRX 700
Ski Doo: Fastest: 2005 Mach Z 1000 Quickest: 2010 800 etec
Arctic Cat: Fastest: 1998 Thundercat 1000 Quickest: 2003 F7
Polaris: Fastest: 2003 XCR 800 Quickest: 1998 700 XC
Yamaha: Fastest: 1995 V-max-4 800 Quickest: 2001 SRX 700
Ski Doo: Fastest: 2005 Mach Z 1000 Quickest: 2010 800 etec
Arctic Cat: Fastest: 1998 Thundercat 1000 Quickest: 2003 F7
Polaris: Fastest: 2003 XCR 800 Quickest: 1998 700 XC
Yamahahoo
VIP Member
bluebullet nice picks. Sxviperguy hopefully you were kidding!
YAMMIEGOD3:16
Active member
BUT YOUR SRX COULD NOT OF BEEN A TURD THOUGH. BUT JEFFS MACH IS BECAUSE THE SLED IS JUNK. MACH , YOUR SOMETHING. 3:16 (yammie tony)MachZ1000 said:You must have a real turd then. Some were slow and some were real fast. The one I had for the past couple years was a rocket.124 mph on the gun for a stock sled is real fast. Even piped and ported Mach Z triples could not run with me. It took a real good running 1998 Thundercat to hang with my 1000 Mach. Any other year I could beat pretty easy. But I only had one other Mach Z 1000 run near me. I did sell it because I was scared to ride it. I read too many horror stories about the motors blowing. And they are HUGE money to fix them. It just wasn't worth keeping.
Last edited:
vmax-540
Member
Tony don't wast you time . He probably has a Mini Z that can smoke your 800!!LOL.. And just for the record ,I don't enjoy putting my own sled down. But they are what they are.. See you Saturday!!
Gitterdun1985
New member
im not a skipoo guy buy wernt the 98 mach Z pretty fast
vmax-540
Member
Yes they were, I had one. With those pipes you couldn't over rev them like the 99's & up Mach's.Keep the RPM's at 8200 and hold on, also the quietest sled I have ever had..
Gitterdun1985
New member
ill stick to ol faithful 95 v4 800 quad powered
vmax-540
Member
Nothing wrong with those either..