I was watching snowmobiler TV last weekend, and they did a review of the Freestyle.
They had some 14 year old kids on there and they talked like that Freestyle was the best thing since sliced bread. They said how the 380 REV felt heavy and bulky but the Freestyle was so light. They said the suspension was great and that it was built for jumping. Now, this show is from Canada, so they tend to favor the Doos (I cant recall how many times they used the term "RX ton" and said how injected 2-strokes are better than 4-strokes) but sheesh! I kept waiting for them to say just before they broke for commercials "this show sponsored by Bombarider Recreational Products!"
Anyways, if that sled was made for jumping as they claimed, why does it only have single a-arms? I mean seriously, how much would it have cost Doo to put a decent front suspension on it (double a-arms)? For the $3000 that the Freestyle costs, I think I would go a little bit better and opt for the 380 REV. At least that is a "real" sled, not some toy that you KNOW is going to break.
Kids are going to start out on these Freestyles (you know they are going to sell like crazy in Canada) and then when they move up to the REV, they are going to have to learn all over again because the REV will be a bigger sled.
I applaude Doo for making the Freestyle but why did they have to cut corners on it like they did?
All in all, if I had a 12 year old kid, Id be finding myself an old Bravo or a Phazer for them to ride.
I dont really think the concern of them learning to ride on a Doo and then sticking with a Doo is all that big because people change brands all the time. When you are out riding, how many people do you see who's suit and sled dont match? Heck, Im riding a Polaris right now but all my riding gear is Yamaha! If Yamaha continues to make quality, innovative products like they have been, they will have NO problem holding onto their current customers and attracting new ones.
Hebi