bluewho said:I cant even imagine how mutch work it was to design a A arm sled like the rx1/ apex with a 4 cyl 4 stroke that takes the same size belt as the old trailing arm sled.It had to be started with that in mind!
I dunno i start seeing red when guys start bitching about this company over silly little things like dip sticks and not haveing there faverite belts for there 10 year old sleds.They are not trying to suck anybody into new sleds but more like trying to stay afloat and make a profit in todays marketplace.
Anybody feal the same way or is it crow for dinner tonight?
.
bluemonster1 said:
bluemonster1 said:since my sxr600 and srx take the 8dn-00's and the Ultimax SRX belt is xs805,they don't use that for my 600 They use 138-4416U4.This belt is about 44 3/4 round,closer to the 8dn-00's. The 805 is about 45 1/8,way to large..
bluewho said:I cant even imagine how mutch work it was to design a A arm sled like the rx1/ apex with a 4 cyl 4 stroke that takes the same size belt as the old trailing arm sled.It had to be started with that in mind!
I dunno i start seeing red when guys start bitching about this company over silly little things like dip sticks and not haveing there faverite belts for there 10 year old sleds.They are not trying to suck anybody into new sleds but more like trying to stay afloat and make a profit in todays marketplace.
Anybody feal the same way or is it crow for dinner tonight?
.
Just spoke with a Carlisle engineer. The newer "top cog" design, has a 'projected' T.W.(top width) & O.D.(outside diameter) because of the top cog design. For the same application, a smooth top belt will have different dimensions.I had a brand new 138-4416U3 (I know U3 slightly differant version but same size) That I had bought for a 95 vmax 600 twin(per book at dealer). Tried it on 2 SRX 700's and a SxR 700. All are aligned perfectly and center to center is spot on and it was squealing like a stuck pig. Gave it to a buddy that has Sx500R and works like champ on his sled.
with you 100+%